Hello,
Just wanted to update you all again. We now have 19 (some paid and some confirmed by e-mail only at this point). As I said before the facilities that we are using for production are operating on a minimum of 25. Since this fashion is for you all, I need some input. Should we change the 1 per member limit to 2? I realize that it is not "ideal" for an exclusive fashion but it may be a small thing to sacrifice in order to make a go of this. Let's start a group discussion because I can't make such a decision without permission from you all!
I'm looking forward to hearing from you!
Thanks, Randall
I still like the one per person idea. We're not far from the minimum. Maybe go ahead & have the 25 made & the extras will be available to members who overlooked it or who may be new. Just my opinion... (Guess with out numbers, I thought we'd easily have 25.) Melissa
Hello,
Just wanted to update you all again. We now have 19 (some paid and some confirmed by e-mail only at this point). As I said before the facilities that we are using for production are operating on a minimum of 25. Since this fashion is for you all, I need some input. Should we change the 1 per member limit to 2? I realize that it is not "ideal" for an exclusive fashion but it may be a small thing to sacrifice in order to make a go of this. Let's start a group discussion because I can't make such a decision without permission from you all!
I'm looking forward to hearing from you!
Thanks, Randall
i am ok with 2... personally
and will get 2 to help out....
love ami
Eugene Bradford wrote:
I still like the one per person idea. We're not far from the minimum. Maybe go ahead & have the 25 made & the extras will be available to members who overlooked it or who may be new. Just my opinion...(Guess with out numbers, I thought we'd easily have 25.)Melissa
Hello, Just wanted to update you all again. We now have 19 (some paid and some confirmed by e-mail only at this point). As I said before the facilities that we are using for production are operating on a minimum of 25. Since this fashion is for you all, I need some input. Should we change the 1 per member limit to 2? I realize that it is not "ideal" for an exclusive fashion but it may be a small thing to sacrifice in order to make a go of this. Let's start a group discussion because I can't make such a decision without permission from you all! I'm looking forward to hearing from you! Thanks, Randall
Randall, I don't think it's fair for us to ask you to fund extras for future buyers, unless you want to do that. Or it is alright with me if we sell a few 2's to a few members-even though that defeats the purpose of an exclusive fashion and I would hate to see it for sale on ebay in the future. However, you're still the captain and do as you think best. Beryl
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Hi all,
I understand the desire to have it an exclusive fashion (1 per member), sorta makes ya feel special, but, if it boils down to letting members purchase two in order to get to the 25 quota, then I think we should do it. I don't think it's fair to Randall to make him fund extra outfits in the hopes others will buy later. He's put a lot of work and effort into this on our behalf and we have to help him make it happen. imho Robin
Choic4guys@aol.com wrote: Hello,
Just wanted to update you all again. We now have 19 (some paid and some confirmed by e-mail only at this point). As I said before the facilities that we are using for production are operating on a minimum of 25. Since this fashion is for you all, I need some input. Should we change the 1 per member limit to 2? I realize that it is not "ideal" for an exclusive fashion but it may be a small thing to sacrifice in order to make a go of this. Let's start a group discussion because I can't make such a decision without permission from you all!
I'm looking forward to hearing from you!
Thanks, Randall
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
It's okay by me as well, I was just surprised that we didn't automatically get 25 up front. Anyone know how many there are on the list? Melissa
Hi all,
I understand the desire to have it an exclusive fashion (1 per member), sorta makes ya feel special, but, if it boils down to letting members purchase two in order to get to the 25 quota, then I think we should do it. I don't think it's fair to Randall to make him fund extra outfits in the hopes others will buy later. He's put a lot of work and effort into this on our behalf and we have to help him make it happen. imho
Robin
I agree as well! I would be willing to purchase two to make up the difference.
Shani-boy
"pa_nz@" pa_nz@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
I understand the desire to have it an exclusive fashion (1 per member), sorta makes ya feel special, but, if it boils down to letting members purchase two in order to get to the 25 quota, then I think we should do it. I don't think it's fair to Randall to make him fund extra outfits in the hopes others will buy later. He's put a lot of work and effort into this on our behalf and we have to help him make it happen. imho Robin
Choic4guys@aol.com wrote: Hello,
Just wanted to update you all again. We now have 19 (some paid and some confirmed by e-mail only at this point). As I said before the facilities that we are using for production are operating on a minimum of 25. Since this fashion is for you all, I need some input. Should we change the 1 per member limit to 2? I realize that it is not "ideal" for an exclusive fashion but it may be a small thing to sacrifice in order to make a go of this. Let's start a group discussion because I can't make such a decision without permission from you all!
I'm looking forward to hearing from you!
Thanks, Randall
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
Hi all,
I normally just lurk, but thought I would come out for minute to post my thoughts.
Changing the limit to 2 would be ok by me. I just really want this outfit and would hate to see it not happen because we can't get the minimum. I would not have thought that would be a problem. As Robin stated, I don't think it would be fair for Randall to have to be responsible for the difference. I don't think everyone who is buying would necessarily buy two, but hopefully enough to get us to the minimum. JMHO.
Mary W. in AZ -Happiness is not a destination, it is a way of travelling- ICQ #2307318
-
amarylla -
Beryl M. -
Choic4guys＠aol.com -
Eugene Bradford -
Mary Westmoreland -
pa_nz＠ -
Shani-Boy