On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
+back-end (seen with @file{gcc-2.95.x}). In such case you can bail out
It *is* gcc-2.95.x (and only gcc-2.95.x, of the versions GPC supports).
I thought someone might want to build with 2.8.x, and I couldn't check if it behaves in the same way.
It doesn't.
I think this will be alright.
------------------------------------------------------------------ diff -u p.dist/doc/en/install.texi p/doc/en/install.texi --- p.dist/doc/en/install.texi 2003-03-22 21:52:50.000000000 +0100 +++ p/doc/en/install.texi 2003-07-15 18:39:13.000000000 +0200 @@ -613,6 +613,17 @@ compiler and RTS, RTSFLAGS are for RTS only, i.e.:@: @samp{make CFLAGS="-O2" RTSFLAGS=-Wall}
+@samp{NOTE} that documentation may fail to build from *.texi sources +if GCC @file{gcc-2.95.x} tries to use an older version of @samp{makeinfo} +supplied in GCC package itself. This can be prevented by supplying explicit +instruction to use your system's @samp{makeinfo}: + +@example +% make MAKEINFO=/path/to/makeinfo +@end example + +optionally followed by the rest of arguments. + @item Completing the installation