Gpc

gpc@gnu.de

5400 discussions

Re: Regular Expression
by Peter Gerwinski 17 Dec '97

17 Dec '97

According to Hans Ecke: > Please excuse me, this is not a mail about GPC in special, but Pascal in > general. I'm searching for an regular expression library - I mean > something like > > function pos(SearchPattern;S:string):integer > > just like BPs build in Pos(SubString,String):integer function. Of course > their is Unix-regexp (in C), but if somebody already had done it in > Pascal, why do unnecessary work of translation? What about writing a GPC unit that interfaces GNU regex and/or GNU rx? > Beside this, I have the suggestion to build at agnes.dida a little > archive of rare plants and vegetables which you seldom find at the net - > like Lex/Yacc and maybe some Programming help (but not yet another SWAG > mirror). Of course this is Peters decission and I dont know if it > would be usefull. It depends, if their are enough good things on the HD of > the list members and if we think of the same if I say "rare good tools and > docs for Pascal Programming". We could make a start with what is crawling > at agnes.dida/gnu-pascal/misc. I would not mind to have such an archive on Agnes, but we must carefully choose what to put there and what not to put there. We must not collect just everything written in Pascal; having an overfull and/or badly documented archive is as useless as having no archive at all. As Agnes is devoted to GNU (that's why I have chosen a name containing "gn":-), I would require everything to be free, i.e. available in source code and without restrictions to use it even commercially. And it would be desirable to have everything ported to GNU Pascal. Peter -- Peter Gerwinski, Essen, Germany, free physicist and programmer Maintainer GNU Pascal - http://home.pages.de/~GNU-Pascal/ - 1 Oct 1997 PGP key fingerprint: AC 6C 94 45 BE 28 A4 96 0E CC E9 12 47 25 82 75 Fight the SPAM! - http://maps.vix.com/

2 1

Re: Script interpreter object specs [Long!]...
by Peter Gerwinski 15 Dec '97

15 Dec '97

According to Orlando Llanes: > > What I'm working on learning now is breaking down an Algabraic > Equation (did I get the right term?) and arranging it so that it's in an > order ready to be translated into the byte codes. I think this step is > called converting Postfix to Infix. I saw some code in Pascal that parses > an equation and translates it by using loops and arrays rather than > recursing. What it does is juggle variable names, I don't know how capable > it is for processing real numbers or others. It only handles * / + and - > but it can be modified to handle Boolean operations, etc. I got the code > out of the Pascal SWAG. I'll upload the code where Peter moved Hans' > upload. Now the trouble begins: Is this program another candidate for that archive of tools? While it compiled straightforwardly with GPC, it is less general than a Pascal `lex' or `yacc', and it is in the SWAG. What are the licensing conditions of that Program? Peter -- Peter Gerwinski, Essen, Germany, free physicist and programmer Maintainer GNU Pascal - http://home.pages.de/~GNU-Pascal/ - 1 Oct 1997 PGP key fingerprint: AC 6C 94 45 BE 28 A4 96 0E CC E9 12 47 25 82 75 Fight the SPAM! - http://maps.vix.com/

2 1

Regular Expression
by Hans Ecke 15 Dec '97

15 Dec '97

Hi all! Please excuse me, this is not a mail about GPC in special, but Pascal in general. I'm searching for an regular expression library - I mean something like function pos(SearchPattern;S:string):integer just like BPs build in Pos(SubString,String):integer function. Of course their is Unix-regexp (in C), but if somebody already had done it in Pascal, why do unnecessary work of translation? Beside this, I have the suggestion to build at agnes.dida a little archive of rare plants and vegetables which you seldom find at the net - like Lex/Yacc and maybe some Programming help (but not yet another SWAG mirror). Of course this is Peters decission and I dont know if it would be usefull. It depends, if their are enough good things on the HD of the list members and if we think of the same if I say "rare good tools and docs for Pascal Programming". We could make a start with what is crawling at agnes.dida/gnu-pascal/misc. Bye Hans

1 0

GNU GUILE...
by Orlando Llanes 14 Dec '97

14 Dec '97

If anyone is interested, the website where I read information about GNU GUILE is: http://ns.cinfo.ru/linux/WWW/www_gnu.org/software/guile/guile.html The thing that GUILE has in common with my script interpreter other than extensibility is providing an interface so that the user is not restricted to just 1 language. Where the line ends on similarity is in the extent of features. What I'm trying to do is create an interface for programmers that is simple yet can do what is required of it, needs little modification, and allows them to add internals from their program into the script language while at the same time keeping it simple and flexible enough for the common ordinary end-user to modify the behavior of the program. GUILE seems to support file I/O and pointer operations, and is expected to (if it doesn't already) have a facility for system calls and system pipes. Allowing those 3 things could be a security compromise for applications such as a game (most likely others, but I can't think of any right now). It's not to say that GUILE is not worth a look, I'm sure it has its uses. See ya! Orlando Llanes "Hey, we all did the drug thing, we all did the money thing, and eventually you find out that none of that stuff fixes anything, and we have nowhere else to go except to evolve spiritually and intellectually" -- Meredith Brooks "Look out fo' flyeeng feet" O__/ a010111t(a)bc.seflin.org \/|____. O <__. \/\> / \ ____________|___\______ http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Monkey414

1 0

Re: Script interpreter object specs [Long!]...
by Peter Gerwinski 13 Dec '97

13 Dec '97

According to Orlando Llanes: > > [...] I found Lex/Yacc for TP on > ieec.com(?), it was a version from the "Dragon Book" [...] I know this is a stupid question but what is the title/author/foobar of this famous "Dragon Book"? I really have the impression that I should read it ... > Below are the specs for the script object > followed by the reasons for the specs and then my plans for the script > executor object.. What is the aim of this scripting language? You are probably not going to reinvent Pascal or Java. I assume that you want to have a language that allows the user to customize and extend the behaviour of your program. Did you have a look at GUILE, GNU's answer to this question? (I haven't, but I have read a lot about GUILE's existence.;-) Or else, what about defining a CGI-like interface between your program and another program written by the user in his/her favourite language? > [...] I'm planning on doing this is by allowing > the programmer to add tokens of their own to the script language at > run-time. What is the difference between this and the concept of user-defined types, variables, and procedures? > Now for the script executor object. I want to have a fixed set of base > opcodes so that no matter what language the scanner is written to handle, > it will always execute the opcodes in the same way, this way 2 or more > script scanners can be written to cater to the tastes of the end-user, but > will execute the same. The GNU compilers also support such a platform-independent "bytecode", and so does UCSD's P-Code and Java's J-Code. Perhaps you should have a look at their specifications first? Those of GCC/GPC are in the source code. Greetings, Peter -- Peter Gerwinski, Essen, Germany, free physicist and programmer Maintainer GNU Pascal - http://home.pages.de/~GNU-Pascal/ - 1 Oct 1997 PGP key fingerprint: AC 6C 94 45 BE 28 A4 96 0E CC E9 12 47 25 82 75 Fight the SPAM! - http://maps.vix.com/

2 1

Re: Script interpreter object specs [Long!]...
by Orlando Llanes 13 Dec '97

13 Dec '97

On Sat, 13 Dec 1997, Stefan Tschirren wrote: > http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Quad/8070/tgc.html > The compiler and interpreter were pretty much working... I cant remember > now, It was a long time ago :-) K00l, I'll check it out :) > The reason I never actually finished that project was because I got stuck! I know how that goes :) > I couldnt figure out a way to make the character that you control move > around the screen, and interact with the enviromnent. EG: The character > must be able to move BEHIND the table, but not THROUGH the table. In other That's the key component to my game lib, and the main reason I want to add a script engine. I saw an article in "Game Developer's Magazine" about one of the programmers of Star Wars (Rebel Assault I think it was? I don't remmeber, could be Shadows Of The Empire), and in the script language it had one for the doors, walls, characters, and I think other things. One of the game designers wrote a script that would flood the level after hitting a certain sequence of switches, and nobody knew how he did it (the programmer who wrote the script engine himself was baffled :), so a good script engine could be a key component. > words, I couldnt figure out a good way of knowing where a character is > allowed to walk... Hmm, now that I come to think of it - It doesnt seem > that hard (I have an idea). Maybe the project will be reborn... Do a web search on Amit Patel, his web site is chock full of A* algorithms and AI. What you need for that is most likely the A* algorithm. > Anyway, if you want to take a look at some source, just ask and Ill email > the whole lot to you. You probably wont understant most of it (I wouldnt!)... > I usually like to keep the end-user away from programming type problems. > Scripting is clearly a programmers job, so it should not be tailored for > the end user (How many end-users actually write macros in MS-WORD??). I IMO, the programming part, the programmer interface, is important to the programmer, but the actual language and syntax is important to the user, not everybody is a programmer. See ya! Orlando Llanes "Hey, we all did the drug thing, we all did the money thing, and eventually you find out that none of that stuff fixes anything, and we have nowhere else to go except to evolve spiritually and intellectually" -- Meredith Brooks "Look out fo' flyeeng feet" O__/ a010111t(a)bc.seflin.org \/|____. O <__. \/\> / \ ____________|___\______ http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Monkey414

1 0

Re: ANNOUNCEMENT : TP Lex/Yacc 4.0
by Peter Gerwinski 13 Dec '97

13 Dec '97

Hi, Hans, Berend, and everybody! > I have uploaded TP Lex/Yacc 4.0 to (see above). Its a Version from October > 96. Author is Berend de Boer mailto:berend@pobox.com. It can be compiled > with and can make code for TP, BP-Real, BP-PM, BP-Windows, Delphi-16, > Delphi-32 (As far as I understood). It should be legal to put it on the > Net, because Berend - may the force be with him - has copyrighted it under > GPL2. I have moved it to ftp://agnes.dida.physik.uni-essen.de/gnu-pascal/misc/ > Maybe somebody has time enough to port it to GPC... I agree that this would be a good thing. Greetings, Peter -- Peter Gerwinski, Essen, Germany, free physicist and programmer Maintainer GNU Pascal - http://home.pages.de/~GNU-Pascal/ - 1 Oct 1997 PGP key fingerprint: AC 6C 94 45 BE 28 A4 96 0E CC E9 12 47 25 82 75 Fight the SPAM! - http://maps.vix.com/

1 0

Re: Compiler writing-related question...
by Peter Gerwinski 13 Dec '97

13 Dec '97

According to Hans Ecke: > > Well, mathematically spoken, there exist at least one solution. I don`t > know where I found it, but I have at home Yacc&Lex for Pascal (with > source, AFAI remember), at least for BP. If you can`t find it in the Net, > I can send it to you (or better, upload it to GPC-home). It is under some > GPL-like licence, allowing to redistribute it. If you would either point us to where we can find it in the Net or upload it to ftp://agnes.dida.physik.uni-essen.de/incoming/ (and send me an E-Mail after you have done), it would be a good thing. :-) Dankeschoen im Voraus, Peter -- Peter Gerwinski, Essen, Germany, free physicist and programmer Maintainer GNU Pascal - http://home.pages.de/~GNU-Pascal/ - 1 Oct 1997 PGP key fingerprint: AC 6C 94 45 BE 28 A4 96 0E CC E9 12 47 25 82 75 Fight the SPAM! - http://maps.vix.com/

2 1

Re: Error report capturing...
by Peter Gerwinski 13 Dec '97

13 Dec '97

According to Orlando Llanes: > > I beleive that gpc outputs to STDERR does it not? I know that gcc does, so > > you would have to do something like > > Sorry, I forgot to say that I'm using DOS :( [...] With DJGPP, use the `redir' program to get the same effect: redir -e <error file> gpc <options to gpc> (See also the DJGPP FAQ list, section 6.10.) Hope this helps, Peter -- Peter Gerwinski, Essen, Germany, free physicist and programmer Maintainer GNU Pascal - http://home.pages.de/~GNU-Pascal/ - 1 Oct 1997 PGP key fingerprint: AC 6C 94 45 BE 28 A4 96 0E CC E9 12 47 25 82 75 Fight the SPAM! - http://maps.vix.com/

1 0

Re: Error report capturing...
by Frank Heckenbach 13 Dec '97

13 Dec '97

Orlando Llanes wrote: > > I beleive that gpc outputs to STDERR does it not? I know that gcc does, so > > you would have to do something like > > Sorry, I forgot to say that I'm using DOS :( I tried what you wrote > anyway, but DOS would just write to the file &1 I looked in the DOS > Programmer's Reference (from DOS 6.0), and the handle to StdOut and StdErr > are different, it looks like DOS only redirects StdOut at the command > line. Yes, stderr is file handle 2 in Dos. You need the redir utility to redirect stderr (should be in one of the DJGPP packages). -- Frank Heckenbach, Erlangen, Germany fjf(a)gmx.de http://home.pages.de/~fjf/links.htm

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

Gpc