29 Jun
2005
29 Jun
'05
8:51 a.m.
Frank Heckenbach wrote:
So, would anybody mind dropping this misfeature, and requiring an identifier in for-loop counters?
Do agree that it is not needed.
The same (and probably a lot of other weird stuff) can be achieved We support `absolute' for BP compatibility, but IMHO then we should restrict it to what BP requires, i.e. really absolute addresses, or the address of entire variables or parameters.
I am not enthousiastic about this one because GPC
- is very restrictive in what typecasts are allowed - typecastst with $R+ cause range-check errors.
Regards,
Adriaan van Os