29 Apr
2013
29 Apr
'13
7:07 a.m.
On 27 Apr 2013, at 20:47, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
[snip]
BTW4: The reporter wrote this clearly in the comment to the FPC bug report...
The poster was obviously heavily invested in getting his code accepted by FPC. Given that GPC is known for its standards compliance and had the same behaviour as FPC, and given the fact that as a non-standards-expert I did not know that for-statement always solely refers to "loop body", I thought the standard was possibly in part self-contradicting or ambiguous (it wouldn't be the first such standard). That's why I asked here rather than just closing the bug report and be done with it, because I knew there are people here who know way more about the Pascal standard than I do.
Jonas