31 May
2004
31 May
'04
1:29 a.m.
On 15:34 30/05/04, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
output etc.). If we teach "GP" to pass `-lm -lgpc', we could get rid of the separate gpc executable and call "GP" gpc. But I'm not sure if everybody would be comfortable with such a change ...
Here's my take on this issue:
When GPC is merged into GCC--where `soon' is barely soon enough (and I think I speak for the majority)--and when, as you have already speculated in your previous post, the gpc executable becomes unnecessary, then people will have to deal with it, whether they'd like to or not.
Soo... I guess what I'm trying to say here is, when the Merge happens, renaming GP's executable into `gpc' won't be a problem.
--
Political Dissident Neil Santos
Free Software Advocate Jabber: nsantos@jabber.org
Please avoid sending me attachments encoded in secret formatting.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html