28 May
2003
28 May
'03
10:46 p.m.
Gale Paeper wrote:
Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Peter N Lewis wrote:
At 22:03 -0700 12/5/03, Gale Paeper wrote:
Use of "packed" could imply a local maximum-field-alignment=8 (or 0) for the type, so that always SizeOf( R) = 1.
So if there's consensus, I think I can change it.
The change sounds fine to me.
The combination of maximum-field-alignment and packed records should allow us to easily ensure records are correctly aligned, so I'd say go ahead with the changes as described - packed should override maximum-field-alignment.
As there seems to be agreement, I'll do this in the next version.
Frank
--
Frank Heckenbach, frank@g-n-u.de, http://fjf.gnu.de/, 7977168E
GPC To-Do list, latest features, fixed bugs:
http://www.gnu-pascal.de/todo.html
GPC download signing key: 51FF C1F0 1A77 C6C2 4482 4DDC 117A 9773 7F88 1707