27 Jul
2010
27 Jul
'10
12:26 p.m.
Hi!
Am 27.07.2010 00:16, schrieb Frank Heckenbach:
[...] I don't see much future in the current way of developing GPC [...]
Me too. A language, wich might not be up to date regardings its features might be used if there is some infrastructure for tasks, eg processing XML, using some high level GUIs and much more. As it seems, there is no one who would like to do this job besides development of GPC itself. Other language groups have all of this, the new ones like "D" and the old ones like "Ada".
For me personally, I don't feel the need for a p2c++ translator as this becomes "just another Pascal dialect".
Eike
--
Eike Krumbacher * Didaktik der Physik * Uni DuE * T03 R06 D05
Tel. 2575