17 Aug
2010
17 Aug
'10
7:07 p.m.
Hiltibidal, Rob wrote:
Personally I prefer dealing with a native pascal compiler
FPC compiles or used to compile to assembler for some things,... very fast.
Seems to me the "pggy back" method for using C as the base compiler will add delayus and debug symbol issues.
Might be a better idea to simply go the byte code route.
That's what an LLVM assembly http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html writer could do (and yes, an LLVM back-end is under consideration for FPC also).
Regards,
Adriaan van Os