17 Aug
2010
17 Aug
'10
9:07 p.m.
Hiltibidal, Rob wrote:
Personally I prefer dealing with a native pascal compiler
FPC compiles or used to compile to assembler for some things,... very fast.
Seems to me the "pggy back" method for using C as the base compiler will add delayus and debug symbol issues.
Might be a better idea to simply go the byte code route.
That's what an LLVM assembly <http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html> writer could do (and yes, an LLVM back-end is under consideration for FPC also). Regards, Adriaan van Os