4 Jun
2002
4 Jun
'02
10:47 a.m.
Maurice Lombardi wrote:
Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Waldek Hebisch wrote:
for i:=1to 5 do j:=j+1;^space missing !
Yes, that's the point. BP does in fact allow this.
So is it better to allow also such a faulty construct in gpc
We do so all the time in the name of BP compatibility. ;-)
But the new lexer will be able to emit a warning or error for such constructs.
Frank
--
Frank Heckenbach, frank@g-n-u.de, http://fjf.gnu.de/, 7977168E
GPC To-Do list, latest features, fixed bugs:
http://www.gnu-pascal.de/todo.html