11 Mar
2003
11 Mar
'03
10:07 p.m.
At 9:18 PM +0100 11/3/03, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Adriaan van Os wrote:
It is true that Think Pascal for Macintosh introduced "uses propagation" as a special feature for practical reasons: the massiveness of the Macintosh Toolbox. In each unit, you typically had to refer to fourty or more other units.
Can anyone tell me what the differences are between my model and Think Pascal? I'm being lazy: I do have an old copy of Think Pascal lying around - not sure if it'll run under Classic on OS X... one day I check this out...
Grant spoke of "MW Pascal". Isn't this the same as Apple MPW Pascal?
Nope. CW = MW (MW is the company that makes CW).
Grant
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Grant Jacobs Ph.D. BioinfoTools
ph. +64 3 476 1820 (office, after 10am) PO Box 6129,
or +64 25 601 5917 (mobile) Dunedin,
gjacobs@bioinfotools.com NEW ZEALAND.
Bioinformatics tools: deriving knowledge from biological data
Bioinformatics tools - software development - consulting - training
Check out the website for more details: http://www.bioinfotools.com
The information contained in this mail message is confidential and
may be legally privileged. Readers of this message who are not the
intended recipient are hereby notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you
have received this message in error please notify the sender immed-
iately and destroy the original message. This applies also to any
attached documents.