On Sun, 17 Aug 2003, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Russell Whitaker wrote:
[..]
It looks that you have not applied the patch that I posted (see for example my first message about Solaris test results). Without the patch the build is known to fail. The patch fixes both problems you met.
Thank you. Once I found the right patch (the one that patches 3 files instead of 2) got this:
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.1/specs Configured with: ../gcc-3.3.1/configure --enable-languages=pascal --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit : (reconfigured) ../gcc-3.3.1/configure --enable-languages=pascal --enable-threads=posix : (reconfigured) ../gcc-3.3.1/configure --enable-languages=pascal --enable-threads=posix : (reconfigured) ../gcc-3.3.1/configure --enable-languages=pascal --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit Thread model: posix gpc version 20030507, based on gcc-3.3.1
with this test results:
TEST fjf480a.pas: SKIPPED: librx not installed TEST fjf480b.pas: SKIPPED: librx not installed TEST fjf582.pas: ./fjf582.pas: In main program: ./fjf582.pas:107: warning: statement with no effect [..] failed TEST regextest.pas: SKIPPED: librx not installed
# of GPC tests 3594 # of GPC tests passed 3590 # of GPC tests skipped 3 # of GPC tests failed 1
The test that failed - is that a bug in gpc, gcc or the test itself?
Russ
Russell Whitaker wrote:
TEST fjf480a.pas: SKIPPED: librx not installed TEST fjf480b.pas: SKIPPED: librx not installed TEST fjf582.pas: ./fjf582.pas: In main program: ./fjf582.pas:107: warning: statement with no effect [..] failed TEST regextest.pas: SKIPPED: librx not installed
# of GPC tests 3594 # of GPC tests passed 3590 # of GPC tests skipped 3 # of GPC tests failed 1
The test that failed - is that a bug in gpc, gcc or the test itself?
A feature in GPC (the new GCC version can detect at compile-time that the test will succeed and generates no code for it) and a little bug in the test (harmless, will be fixed in the next release).
Frank