Clyde Meli wrote:

The hut.fi came from the reply header, so perhaps it needs to be updated.

Huh? There is no reply header unless you set one.

(Before anyone asks: This is intentionally so. See: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html)

You are right about the fact that it would have flagged/ rejected these emails also. IMHO it's worth it.

Okay. Any objections?

Peter