Gpc

gpc@gnu.de

5400 discussions

Turning Off Specific Compiler Warnings
by Yang Lao 01 Jan '09

01 Jan '09

Is there a way to turn off specific compiler warnings? The particular warning that gets in the way of the more helpful ones is: warning: missing string capacity - assuming 255

3 4

Linux Binaries and Makefile
by Mario Fetka 24 Dec '08

24 Dec '08

Hallo, i have read trough the mail archive : " From: Prince Riley Subject: Linux Binaries and Makefile Date: 15 Dec 2008, 16:32:20 ..... There's been a suggestion to have a repository set up on Sourceforge which is a very well known open source project repository. If anyone would like to suggest another site, please do so. .... " my suggestion is to setup the version controllsystem on gnu-pascal.de and a bugtracker if needed mailinglist already exists my second suggestion is to create repositories for the different os's on gnu-pascal.de for ex: packages.gnu-pascal.de/deb for debian/ubuntu packages.gnu-pascal.de/mandriva packages.gnu-pascal.de/fedora packages.gnu-pascal.de/suse just my 2 euro Cent Mario

4 4

Re: Linux Binaries and Makefile
by Prof A Olowofoyeku (The African Chief) 24 Dec '08

24 Dec '08

On 16 Dec 2008 at 10:49 Kevan Hashemi wrote: >I downloaded to my Linux machine (home folder, not desktop). >I extracted. I see the pascal folder. I run pascal/bin/gpc. sudo tar -zxvf gpc-20070904.i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz -C / export PATH=$PATH:/pascal/bin Best regards, The Chief -------- Prof. Abimbola A. Olowofoyeku (The African Chief) web: http://www.greatchief.plus.com/

4 9

Re: Linux Binaries and Makefile
by Yang Lao 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

Per distro setups. On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Martin Marques <mmarques(a)unl.edu.ar> wrote: > What situation are you talking of? > > Yang Lao escribió: > >> Please do not do this. The Linux Standard Base exists in order to avoid >> this situation. >> >> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Mario Fetka <mario.fetka(a)gmail.com<mailto: >> mario.fetka(a)gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> my suggestion is to setup the version controllsystem on >> gnu-pascal.de <http://gnu-pascal.de> >> and a bugtracker if needed >> mailinglist already exists >> >> my second suggestion is to create repositories for the different os's >> on gnu-pascal.de <http://gnu-pascal.de> >> >> for ex: >> >> packages.gnu-pascal.de/deb <http://packages.gnu-pascal.de/deb> for >> debian/ubuntu >> packages.gnu-pascal.de/mandriva < >> http://packages.gnu-pascal.de/mandriva> >> packages.gnu-pascal.de/fedora >> packages.gnu-pascal.de/suse >> <http://packages.gnu-pascal.de/fedorapackages.gnu-pascal.de/suse> >> >> just my 2 euro Cent >> >> Mario >> >> >> >> >> >> >

1 0

Re: Turning Off Specific Compiler Warnings
by Adriaan van Os 22 Dec '08

22 Dec '08

(repost) Yang Lao wrote: > Is there a way to turn off specific compiler warnings? In general {$local W-} DoSomethingPotentiallyDangerous; {$endlocal} or on the command-line -Wno-xxx (e.g. -Wno-cast-align) > The particular warning that gets in the way of the more helpful ones is: > > warning: missing string capacity - assuming 255 but I don't know of an xxx for this particular warning. Regards, Adriaan van Os

1 0

Linux Binaries and Makefile
by gmail.com 20 Dec '08

20 Dec '08

1 0

[Fwd: Fwd: GPC Home Page]
by Adriaan van Os 09 Dec '08

09 Dec '08

Forwarding from a private email. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Fwd: GPC Home Page Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:46:16 -0600 From: Prince Riley <wmarketing3(a)gmail.com> To: Adriaan van Os <gpc(a)microbizz.nl> References: <48187967.3080904(a)brandeis.edu> <48187E48.8000302(a)microbizz.nl> Hello I was following this thread and I have the same question, where are the Linux and MinGW binaries for this? Thanks Prince ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Adriaan van Os* <gpc(a)microbizz.nl <mailto:gpc@microbizz.nl>> Date: Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:12 AM Subject: Re: GPC Home Page To: gpc(a)gnu.de <mailto:gpc@gnu.de> Kevan Hashemi wrote: Where can I get the latest GPC binaries for MacOS, Linux, and MinGW? If the binaries are not available, where can I download the latest source files? The Mac OS X version has recently been updated to use gpc-20070904. As was announced on this list on April 15, sources, binaries and a build script for Mac OS X are available from my website <http://www.microbizz.nl/gpc.html>. Regards, Adriaan van Os

2 1

[Fwd: Fwd: GPC Home Page]
by Adriaan van Os 09 Dec '08

09 Dec '08

1 0

X86 Solaris 10 Binaries
by Gloria, Jing 26 Nov '08

26 Nov '08

Where can I find a build for GPC on X86 Solaris 10?

2 1

Re: [Core] [RFA/DWARF2] Handle nested subprograms in CU pc bound calculation
by Pierre Muller 02 Oct '08

02 Oct '08

Hi Daniel, > -----Message d'origine----- > De : gdb-patches-owner(a)sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches- > owner(a)sourceware.org] De la part de Daniël Mantione > Envoyé : Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:43 AM > À : FPC Core Developer List > Cc : Pierre Muller; gpc(a)gnu.de; gdb-patches(a)sourceware.org > Objet : Re: [Core] [RFA/DWARF2] Handle nested subprograms in CU pc > bound calculation > > > > Op Wed, 1 Oct 2008, schreef Joel Brobecker: > > > The answer to the question above lies in the Pascal parser. But when > > there are homonyms, how do you specify in your program exactly which > > one you mean? And does GDB provide the same method for distinguishing > > these homonyms? > > > > (need to relearn Pascal one of these days...) > > Pascal has a stack based symbol resolving (we call it the symtablestack > in > the compiler). For example take for example the following program: > > program my_program; > > uses unit_a,unit_b,unit_c; > > var a:integer; > > procedure main_procedure; > > var a:integer; > > procedure sub_procedure; > > var a:integer; > > begin > a:=1; > main_procedure.a:=1; > my_program.a:=1; > unit_a.a:=1; > unit_b.a:=1; > unit_c.a:=1; > end; > > begin > end; Daniel, did you really try to compile this? Both Free Pascal 1.0.10 and 2.2.0 fail to compile on the 'main_procedure.a:=1;' line. > So each procedure context can redefine identifiers. > > Inside sub_procedure, the symtablestack will look like: > > unit_a > unit_b > unit_c > my_program > main_procedure > sub_procedure The stack is correct, but the problem is that if main_procedure would be a function, then main_function would be usable inside sub_procedure either as a nested call by adding an explicit main_function() even if the function has no parameters, or to set the return value of main_function function. Thus main_function. is not allowed at least not for versions <= 2.2.0. Did that change in 2.2.2? > When searching for a symbol, the compiler will search the symbol tables > bottom to top, starting at sub_procedure, ending at unit_a, the first > symbol found is used. GDB would need to implement the same behaviour in > it's Pascal mode. The main current problem is that GDB knows nothing about the used or loaded units ... In stabs, I believe that there is no information on that... Does dwarf have something about this? Of course, we could try to demangle the assembler labels used to extract unit name, but I seem to remember that, at least for Free Pascal, that mangling scheme is version dependent, which will not simplify things :( I also vaguely remember that GPC did not, at least for a while, add anything to the procedure/function names declared in the interface part of units, as in C language. This had the big drawback of preventing to have the same global function/procedure in two different units that is normally allowed according to pascal syntax. Could someone from the GPC development team tell us if this limitation is still in place or if it has been lifted? Thanks for the answers, Pierre Muller Pascal language support maintainer for GDB

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

Gpc